Chandril Sood vs Christopher Marquis Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L L L W L
Form
L L L L L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Sood 1 - 0 Marquis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sood winning 2 and Marquis winning 0. The last match between Sood and Marquis was at the New Delhi Challenger, 14-02-2015, Q1 round, Hard with Chandril Sood getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chandril Sood | 1 |
| Christopher Marquis | 0 |
New Delhi Challenger(14-02-2015)
7
6
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Monteiro VS Quinn PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Chandril Sood
Player
Christopher Marquis
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:34:0 | Average Match Time | 1:34:0 |
| 57% (36/63) | 1st Serve % | 54% (39/72) |
| 86% (31/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (30/39) |
| 67% (18/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 38% (27/72) | Return Points Win % | 22% (14/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chandril Sood Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Chandril Sood
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
72)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Chandril Sood
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yash Chaurasia
Player
Chandril Sood
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Christopher Marquis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Q | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(7) ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suraj R Prabodh
Player
Christopher Marquis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Temur Ismailov
Player
Christopher Marquis
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
11
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher Marquis
Player
Vignesh Peranamallur-Chandrasekhar
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Christopher Marquis
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41% (92/132) | Win/Loss | 37% (37/62) |
| 43% (216/284) | Sets Win/Loss | 38% (82/135) |
| 48% (2128/2330) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (887/1079) |
| 40% (64/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (31/45) |
| 46% (28/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 18% (2/9) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 172 | Aces Total | 40 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 334 | Total Double Faults | 54 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 380.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.53 |
| 55% (2443/4464) | 1st Serve % | 57% (422/739) |
| 64% (1556/2443) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (286/422) |
| 44% (895/2021) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (125/317) |
| 42% (198/466) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (20/50) |
| 40% (1804/4559) | Return Points Win % | 33% (225/683) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (9/11) | Challenger W/L | 27% (4/11) |
| 41% (83/120) | Futures W/L | 39% (32/50) |
| 40% (89/221) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (35/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (13/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (8/18) |
| 36% (19/53) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 83% (103/85) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (38/31) |
| 17% (103/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (38/7) |
| 6% (121/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (61/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
